On 02/11/2019 16:55, Ryan Joseph via fpc-pascal wrote:
I've wanted to make a generic version of a vector for a while but I always give 
up because it seems not very possible. It's probably not even a great idea 
because many methods don't translate between float and integer but I wanted to 
prevent other code duplication if possible.

Here's an example of how things break down. Are there any solutions for this 
currently? I feel like generics need to support some compiler directives so 
different blocks of code can specialize different depending on the type.

{$mode objfpc}
{$modeswitch advancedrecords}

program generic_vector_2;
uses
   Math;

type
   generic TVec2<TScalar> = record
     x, y: TScalar;
     function Normalize: TVec2;
   end;
   TVec2f = specialize TVec2<Float>;
   TVec2i = specialize TVec2<Integer>;

function TVec2.Normalize: TVec2;
var
   fac: TScalar;
begin
   // Can't determine which overloaded function to call
   // Incompatible types: got "Extended" expected "LongInt"
   fac:=Sqrt(Sqr(x) + Sqr(y));
   if fac<>0.0 then begin
     // Incompatible types: got "Single" expected "LongInt"
     fac:=1.0/fac;
     result.x:=x*fac;
     result.y:=y*fac;
   end else begin
     result.x:=0;
     result.y:=0;
   end;
end;

begin
end.

Regards,
        Ryan Joseph

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal


You need to do a explicit typecasting.

...
fac:=Sqrt(Sqr(TScalar(x)) + Sqr(TScalar(y)));
...
fac:=1.0/TScalar(fac);

_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to