> On Dec 27, 2019, at 10:29 AM, Ryan Joseph <generic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's really just about the namespace and avoiding deeply nested this.that.do > kind of syntax. We could accomplish this using just plain records, no need to > even get involved with the complicated interface syntax. According to the > wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trait_(computer_programming) lots of other > languages are having this need to build component like systems and want a > syntax that formalizes the concept.
I also wanted to mention this article which talks about default interface implementation (protocols in Swift) which exists in at least C# and Swift. Is that a viable route perhaps since we already have interfaces? http://machinethink.net/blog/mixins-and-traits-in-swift-2.0/ Regards, Ryan Joseph _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
