> perhaps calculate those results by hand and assign them.. then fix it
later? hehe

Yes, that is the thing with the gurus, it must seem complicated.

I agree that writing this:

> foldlevelmask = byte(not (foldhiddenmask or currentfoldhiddenmask)); 

is much more impressive than writing this:

> foldlevelmask = -193

;-)






-----
Many thanks ;-)
--
Sent from: http://free-pascal-general.1045716.n5.nabble.com/
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to