> On Jan 3, 2023, at 3:12 PM, Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > But then you don't use the type name either. You simply do "o.Create(...)". >
Ohhhh I get it now. I didn’t realize you couldn’t create on the type. That breaks my entire design then. It would be great to have a modern object that behaved more like classes but on the stack (like C++ does). Regards, Ryan Joseph _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
