I've done a new version with magnifying glass. I would be really interested in seeing a more professional version though.
As for license, what you suggested sounds about right :P -Torkild On Nov 19, 2007 10:20 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Torkild Retvedt wrote: > > I was thinking, seeing as this project seems to have gained a bunch of > > activity for the last couple of weeks, it would be a shame not to have > > a logo. I'm not going to insist that I know what I'm doing, but > > thought it at least could be nice to start a discussion around the > > topic. > > > > Attached is a few examples I made. They're all in png, but I can > > supply eps if wanted (thought it would be a bit ugly to send 500kB to > > the mailing list). > > Thanks so much!! Indeed, a logo is desperately needed :) > I chose image #1 from your samples. I like it, but I'll happily consider > others if they are contributed. > > Are you OK with this being licensed under CC-BY-SA? > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ > > I may also choose to include it in GPL-2 software in future. > > I have to do an academic project seminar next week. This logo will > prettify it up a bit -- thanks!! > > Daniel >
<<attachment: fprint4.png>>
_______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
