Daniel Drake wrote: > Christopher Chan wrote: >> Any plans to make libfprint so? > > No, I don't see the point myself, but if people disagree I would support > any efforts to have a compatibility layer.
Ah well, so much for across the board compatibility (after reading FAQ). > >> BTW you have 'competition' with respects to certain hardware support >> elsewhere, http://opensolaris.org/os/project/fingerprint-authentication/ > > Heh, thanks for the link. Doesn't seem to be much available there though > (download link doesn't work). And the licensing, the "Open"Solaris > Binary License, leaves much to be desired: > http://opensolaris.org/os/licensing/opensolaris_binary_license/ Hence 'competition'. The guy behind libfpr also did not see any value in implementing bioapi. I hope your libfprint gets to be a future defacto standard across Linux/BSD/UNIX. _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
