On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 19:33 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: <snip> > This functionality should go in fprintd, not pam_fprint. Then pam_fprint > needs rewriting to use fprintd. > > fprintd already has an abstraction layer for different storage backends, > but it might need adaptation to better suit your needs.
Binary blobs of fingerprints can be stored in different backends. I'm planning on getting a few people to come up with a schema to add it to the Red Hat/Fedora LDAP server. But that would need somebody to write an LDAP storage backend to fprintd, and rewriting pam_fprint to use fprintd. I'll probably get to the latter when I receive a more featureful device to test with. Cheers _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
