Pavel Herrmann wrote: > Just a thought, is the only difference between UPEK TS scanner variants > the existence of the crypto coprocessor? Can we try to bypass the > coprocessor and turn the "old" variant supported by upekts driver into > imaging device as in windows with the advantage of identification?
I don't know the details of the differences, but libbsapi only supports the sensor-only devices and my own code does not work with the coprocessor variant. Also we can do identification with the 0483:2016 hardware, it's just we haven't reverse engineered that bit yet. Daniel _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
