Michael Cronenworth wrote: > I've attempted to look at the other two aes drivers for pointers but > they are both written differently and I don't fully understand the API > or hardware yet. Any tips would be appreciated.
The drivers are a bit messy, sorry about that. The aes1610 is similar to the aes2501 though, you should use that as a base. I don't think it changes the imaging algorithms much, but it has been a while since I worked on this stuff so maybe I'm forgetting something. Thanks! Daniel _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
