Hi all,
For what it's worth, I think the citizens of Framingham did a fantastic job last night at the selectmen's meeting.  I also think it is terrific to see John Kahn and Ginger Esty take a clear position on this property. 
I'm all for compromise where compromise is beneficial in the long term.  But not on this one.  The parcel of land is too small for compromise.  The results of compromise here is, in perpetuity, negative - short term money is gone, contiguous open space is gone, and additional housing congestion will remain.  This is a forever action we are discussing here.  Once its done you can't bring it back!!!!
Keep up the good work.
 
By the way, it has come to my attention that I was totally duped on the name Arthur Morency - good one Tom.  But wait a minute, it still sounds like a great name and takes in both towns interest.  I think "Arthur Morency Woods" it should be and let an urban legend grow. 
(Besides its easy to remember.)
 
Peace,
Leslee
----- Original Message -----
From: N. Cataldo
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 7:51 AM
Subject: Selectmen's Mtg Last Night

 
Selectmen Chairman Esther Hopkins last night attempted to block residents' efforts to find  a means to prevent the sale of a piece of woodlands in South Framingham,  calling them a "group of unauthorized persons who came together in a rush."  She ruled that a motion to allow the group to pursue state funding was out of order, but was overruled by her fellow selectmen.
 
28 concerned citizens attended last night's meeting to support an ad hoc group who are working to prevent the development of the Arthur St/Morency St Woods.  In addition an e-mail petition of 25 residents was also presented in support.  The group asked only that selectmen review at their next meeting a grant application that could result in a half-million dollars in state funds for the development and maintenance of the land. 
 
The group was formed of citizens and various board members of both Framingham and Natick and has been working for several weeks to put together a grant application to secure state Open Space funding.
 
Selectman John Kahn countered Hopkins' block by moving that the board vote on whether the motion was out of order.  With Selectman Sisitsky abstaining due to a possible conflict of interest, the remaing selectman were unanimous in voting that the motion was valid.  Kahn said he doesn't want the actions of  Selectman to discourage residents from taking part in such decisions and he feels that the diposition of the land must be handled in a more public manner than it has been in the past.
 
Town Manager George King said that town personnel are too busy to assist the group in preparing the grant application and once again pressed his stand that the land represents a liability.  However, other sources have pointed out that any liability on the property would be limited to the "attractive nuisance" that is created by the old sewer pipe and piles of curb stone that the DPW has stored in the woodlands. 
 
- Nicola Cataldo
Chairman of the unauthorized
Arthur-Morency Woods Joint Working Group
 
 

Reply via email to