Just a quick addition.  I agree that the bit in this
question about lawsuits is bone-headed.  Note that
both O'Brien and Romney have pledged to remove this
language if it makes it to them.  I don't know about
the other candidates.  I guess I'm assuming one of the
"major" party candidates will win.
Andy


--- Joel A Feingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forwarding this.
> 
> Joel A. Feingold 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Shapiro
> [mailto:RShapiro@;assetmortgage.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:09 PM
> To: Joel A Feingold
> Subject: RE: Bilingual Forum Reminder!
> 
> 
> Becaon Hill has passed a new law (went through as
> the Larkin Bill) that
> addressed many of the issues you mentioned.  The
> Larkin Law is the
> alternative to Q2.  
> 
> Richard Shapiro
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel A Feingold [mailto:blammo@;rcn.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:02 PM
> To: Norma Shulman; Steve Orr; Framingham Neighbors
> Subject: RE: Bilingual Forum Reminder!
> 
> 
> Dear Friends and Neighbors,
> 
> I can't make the forum so I decided to send out a
> note.
> 
> There is much room to disagree about Question 2. I
> have researced this
> question some and would like to give you a very
> brief capsule of what I
> have
> found. Of course, the following points are GENERAL,
> and I am not going
> to go
> on long with specific examples.
> 
> 1.    BOTH Bilingual Education and English Immersion
> are very tricky
> because
> the abilities of the students vary dramatically with
> their age.
> 
>       a. In general, young students from preschool
> through perhaps
> later grammer
> school, respond very well to Immersion because
> innate language learning
> skills are still intact.
> 
>       b. Older students, perhaps 10 to 12 and up, have
> fairly "Hard
> Wired" brains
> and the natural language learning skills are
> diminished. (This is very
> well
> established by linguists as correct by modern
> scientific standards.) As
> the
> student is older, Immersion is less effective.
> 
>       c. By the time a student is in the 15 to 18 year
> old range
> Immersion is
> almost always a failure, as measured by the ability
> of the student to
> succeed in the classroom with the normal curriculum.
> Students in this
> age
> range need Bilingual Education to keep up with their
> age peers while
> they
> learn English. It takes, on average, about 3 years,
> for a student in
> this
> age bracket to gain sufficient proficency for
> educational success.
> 
> Conclusion # 1 -- A blend of both Bilingual and
> Immersion styles would
> best
> suit our students.
> 
> 2.    The consequences of foreign language students
> being placed in
> English
> only normal curriculum classes before they are
> adaquately proficient has
> negative consequences for ALL.
> 
>       a. The foreign language students will not receive a
> satisfactory
> education,
> dooming them to low income jobs and second class
> citizenship.
> 
>       b. Due to the ethnic composition of the students
> this results in
> a success
> gap by national origin or ethnicity, which is
> problematic for our
> integrated
> society which values providing all people of all
> ethnic and religious
> backgrounds good, if not equal, opportunities for
> advancement.
> 
>       c. Inability to succeed in class often results in
> students
> becoming
> disruptive and their friustrations grow. Disiplinary
> problems occur.
> Teachers are thrust into more difficult roles and
> are less focussed upon
> the
> actual teaching of their subjects while they manage
> classroom behavior.
> Great stress may be added. The other students
> educational forum is
> diminished.
> 
>       d. More of these students become marginalized by
> society and are
> vulnerable
> to becoming victims of criminals or criminals
> themselves.
> 
> Conclusion # 2 --  It is worth it to retain at least
> some Bilingual
> Education for students learning english who are (for
> arguments' sake) 13
> or
> over. This benefits them, the teachers, their
> classmates, and society
> itself
> over the long haul.
> 
> 3.    The Ballot Question opens up our teachers to
> Lawsuits. This is
> grossly
> punitive and flies in the face of what I believe our
> education system
> should
> include. It sends a horrible message to our
> teachers.
> 
> My overall conclusion is that while our system of
> Bilingual Education is
> probably ready for some improvement, that will come
> from changes that
> enhance the opportunities for all students without
> reducing the
> opportunities of others. Ballot Question 2 should
> get a no vote.
> 
> Joel A. Feingold
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:owner-frambors@;syslang.net]On
> Behalf Of Norma Shulman
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:20 PM
> To: Steve Orr; Framingham Neighbors
> Subject: Re: Bilingual Forum Reminder!
> 
> 
> Please follow the detailed discussion on this ballot
> question (#2) to be
> thoroughly informed before voting. If you cannot
> make it to the forum, I
> understand that it will be filmed bu Framingham
> Government Access TV -
> watch for it on AT&T channel 9/17 and on RCN channel
> 16. Much better to
> attend in person, if possible, so you can ask
> questions!
> 
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with body
> "unsubscribe frambors" (the subject is ignored).
> 
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with body
> "unsubscribe frambors" (the subject is ignored).
> 
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with body
> "unsubscribe frambors" (the subject is ignored).


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body
"unsubscribe frambors" (the subject is ignored).

Reply via email to