http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/203/metro/Delay_in_board_appointments_
raises_questions+.shtml

 

FRAMINGHAM
Delay in board appointments raises questions 

By Matt Viser, Globe Correspondent, 7/22/2003 

After twice delaying the Conservation Commission's appointments, the
town manager said yesterday that he plans to fill four positions on the
seven-member board at this week's Board of Selectmen meeting. 

The board hasn't operated at full strength since two members resigned in
May, which members say has made it difficult to achieve a quorum. 

In addition, two other members' terms expired on June 30. 

''I just don't understand his reason for delaying,'' said Chairman
William G. Merriam, one of the members who has asked the town manager to
reappoint him for another three-year term. 

''Administratively, it's made things difficult. If anyone's absent or
needs to recuse themselves [from a decision because of a conflict of
interest], it makes it really tough.'' 

Town Manager George P. King Jr. says he hasn't purposefully been
dragging his feet on the appointments, and adds that the recent
resignation of Conservation Administrator Cindy Dionne has contributed
to the delay. 

Dionne, whose resignation is effective next month, is moving to Maine,
where her husband has taken a new job. 

''Ideally, they would have been appointed earlier,'' he said. ''But I
wanted to take the opportunity to think about it a little bit.'' 

As town manager, King is in charge of appointing members to three
different town boards: the Conservation Commission, the Historical
Commission, and the Commission on Disability. 

Most town appointments were done at the Board of Selectmen's meeting in
May. At that time, King said he would make appointments to the
Conservation Commission on July 10, but he later delayed those
indefinitely, until his announcement yesterday. 

There are no laws or statutes that dictate when King must make his
appointments, although most term limits expire on June 30. 

Merriam and Andrew Toorock , whose term limits have expired, are allowed
to continue to serve on the Conservation Commission until they are
either reappointed or someone is appointed in their spot. 

Since May, when two members resigned, the commission has had only five
members, and town counsel advised the board that they still needed four
members to have a quorum. 

Merriam said he had to return early from a family vacation in northern
Maine to make sure enough members were present at a meeting last month.
And there have been several instances where Conservation Commission
meetings were delayed for at least an hour simply because they were
waiting on one member. 

''It's kind of embarrassing, all of us just sitting around, but legally,
we can't open the hearing until we have a quorum,'' Merriam said. 

In addition to Merriam and Toorock asking to be reappointed, six others
have submitted applications for four open slots on the commission,
according to King. 

A town official who asked not to be identified said that King could be
delaying the appointments to make it difficult for the commission to
file an article at the fall Town Meeting that would negate a $1 million
land deal that King orchestrated two years ago with Natick. 

The Conservation Commission opposed the deal, which would place a
four-lot subdivision on two of the 14 acres off Pumpkin Pine Road and
turn the remaining land over to Natick's Conservation Commission. 

Last month, a Town Meeting article that would have authorized the deal
failed, and the Board of Selectmen have been working to bring it back in
the fall. But Merriam said several Town Meeting members have asked the
Conservation Commission to draft a competing article that would preserve
all 14 acres. He said the commission has not yet formally discussed the
issue. 

King denies that the land deal has anything to do with his delay in
appointing new members to the commission. 

''That just doesn't make any sense,'' he said. ''It's not even worth
talking about. I don't see how the two are related at all.'' 

King has also drawn fire recently from the Disability Commission, which
is short two members and has been waiting several weeks for the town
manager to appoint new members. 

''Is it because we're bringing to their attention problems with the
schools? Accessibility? There are places that aren't in compliance with
the [Americans with Disabilities Act], and that's going to cost the town
money,'' said Dennis Polselli, a member of the Disability Commission.
''There's a feeling on the part of some of the committee members that
this is retaliatory.'' 

King vehemently denies that he has anything against the nine-member
disability board. 

''If I thought they were doing the something wrong, cynically I could
appoint more people to dilute them'' rather than stall their
appointments, he said. ''Believe me, I don't spend my days out to get
the Conservation Commission and the Disability Commission. This is a big
town, and there's lots of other things to get done.'' 

Matt Viser can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

This story ran on page B2 of the Boston Globe on 7/22/2003. 
C  <http://www.boston.com/globe/search/copyright.html> Copyright 2003
Globe Newspaper Company. 

/andrea carr-evans

pct. 3

 

 

To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with body
"unsubscribe frambors" (the subject is ignored).

Reply via email to