> Bill Swallow wrote: > > Being a manager and until recently a template > owner, I completely disagree. UI tweaks passively hinder > misuse. Proper training and education for writers actively > prevents misuse, and even initiates their own investigation > into other ways to prevent needless headaches in a > documentation effort. ============================================ All well and good, but the certainty of retribution is better. In structured Frame, retribution is certain. Tell your writers that each document they turn in for edit/review will first be subjected to the following steps:
1. Open the writer's submission. 2. Open the applicable structured template. 3. Import formats from the template with Format/Overrides turned on. 4. Import the element definitions from the template with Format Rules Overrides turned on. 5. Validate the writer's submission to detect any structure violations, including detection of failure to enter values for required attributes. To impress new writers with all the implications of this process, have a sample demonstration document with instances of each type of violation, and demonstrate what happens when the above steps are taken. Dan Emory & Associates FrameMaker/FrameMaker+SGML Document Design & Database Publishing DW Emory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
