Well, assuming the text is a continuous flow, it'll write out to .rtf
that way too.
Because they're graphics intensive, I'd do the .rtf to get the words
and then, if necessary, do a second save of the .pdf to .PNG or .JPG
to get the graphics.
Art
On 10/4/06, Pinkham, Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for this, Art, and my apologies for not being more precise. In
our case, we have multiple-page, sometimes graphic-intensive PDFs,
provided by our vendors, that we include as appendices today. The
advantage to being able to bring them purely (or relatively purely) into
Frame would primarily be for purposes such as generated tables and
internal cross-references. However, placing documents that sometimes
have 20-40 individual pages into FM, one page at a time, would not be a
process improvement. Nor would it be worthwhile if we had to
significantly compromise quality -- then we'd still be better off with
our current string of PDFs.
--
Art Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent
and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
No disclaimers apply.
DoD 358
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com
Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
