If it is good enough for IBM, it is probably job safe in smaller companies:
http://www.ibm.com/redbooks/redwiki
Some lists of wiki systems, proprietary as well as free:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wiki_software
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiEngines
http://www.wikimatrix.org/
http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonWikiEngines
http://java-source.net/open-source/wiki-engines
A popular integrated wiki/tracking/revision environment:
http://trac.edgewall.org/
kind regards
Peter Ring
Chris Borokowski wrote:
I won't use WikiPedia as a source anymore because I've
been burned too many times. The writers tell you what
they want to tell you, which is often far from
comprehensive. It's a very biased, often inaccurate,
source. It's worth the extra five minutes to do the
real research.
However, wikis as a concept shouldn't be confused with
Wikipedia. I like wikis in small settings like
companies where someone can fix or weed out the
inaccurate. As someone else here said, they're
conversational sources of information. People document
informal best practices through them, and you should
consider them like a half-drunk SME: they'll give you
an answer that's mostly complete in a shorthand of
their own.
<snip/>
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or visit
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com
Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
