I honestly came to the same conclusions about Blaze. I don't see it being that much different from Flare at all. I was also disappointed that it wasn't true XML (it's XHTML) and that it's not DITA capable from what I've seen. IMO it's not an alternative to FM at all.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:30 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have been waiting with baited breath ever since the rumors of MadCap Blaze > came forth, that a replacement to > FrameMaker was in the works. I just downloaded the public beta. > > Has anyone else done so? If so I wonder if anyone else shares my > disappointment. > > Blaze appears to be a variant of Flare. It isn't an authoring tool so much > as a conversion tool. It seems not to know > if its main thrust is HTML or XML, and it seems to lean heavily toward HTML. -- Bill Swallow HATT List Owner WWP-Users List Owner Senior Member STC, TechValley Chapter STC Single-Sourcing SIG Manager http://techcommdood.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
