And, Acrobat Pro allows you to merge the comments together into one pdf.
Alan On 23/01/2009, at 11:36 AM, Art Campbell wrote: > The web server option is just that -- a option. Not required. > > If you don't use the (free, for now) adobe.com option, you can use > any LAN > network folder that allows all reviewers r/w access as the base > location for > the review. > > Art > > Art Campbell > art.campb...@gmail.com > "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 > Vincent and a > redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson > No disclaimers > apply. > DoD 358 > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Fred Ridder <docu...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> Responding to Leif Erikson, Richard Combs wrote: >> >>> You need Pro or Pro Extended to create a PDF that reviewers can >>> mark up >>> with Adobe Reader. The version comparison matrix is at: >>> >>> http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/matrix.html >> >> It's my understanding that what you need the Pro Extended version for >> is to implement the shared browser-based review using Acrobat.com >> and avoiding the hassle of setting up your own web server with the >> (very expensive) Acrobat server extensions software. And the >> advantage >> of the browser-based review workflow over one that uses a file server >> is that each reviewer's markup gets merged into the master review >> file >> so that all reviewers see all previous markup/comments. >> >> -Fred Ridder >> >> _ _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to Framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
