Just to add to the mix. I'm noticing also that companies, irregardless of
tool, customize their XML in some way that makes it become 'unpure'.
The files that I authored in Epic, that I thought should have been very close
to the open source version of XML, where unreadable by the open source
compiler. I had nothing fancy, just a heading, and a couple of paragraphs.
I find it facinating. And it feels like there is the potential for some sort
of fancy doctoral study on this sort of thing. How open source/industry
standard things become customized and particular to a company or group of
people. DocBook vs DITA included. Both are XML, but o, how different they are.
-meg
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:09:51 -0600
From: Jan Whitacre <jwhi...@verizon.net>
Subject: XML Output from FrameMaker not Pure XML?
I was told that the XML output from FrameMaker was not ?pure XML,?...that it
adds some kind of FrameMaker tagging.
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to Framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.
Send list messages to fram...@lists.frameusers.com.
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com
or visit
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com
Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
