If your only reason for considering structured FrameMaker is because you
want some kind of XML solution, then read up about XML. However, there
are benefits to using a structured authoring environment that have
nothing to do with converting to XML. They involve controlling the
quality and consistency of the documents you product, how you re-use
content within the FrameMaker environment, and other good stuff. I'm a
lone writer too and I think it's worth it.
Fred
Message: 1
Subject: RE: Training materials for Structured FrameMaker 9
>
What about taking this one step back? I'm the lone writer in my organization
and any innovations have to be led by me with a damn good case for ROI, e.g.,
moving from Word to FrameMaker was a 2 year process (budget is the main reason
I have to over-prove my case).
etc
Alison Craig, Technical Writer
--
Fred Wersan
Senior Technical Writer
VT MAK
68 Moulton St.
Cambridge, MA 02138
617-876-8085 x 124
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to framers as [email protected].
Send list messages to [email protected].
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[email protected]
or visit
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com
Send administrative questions to [email protected]. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
