Hi Joseph...  Thanks for setting this straight.  I guess that would mean that 
saving in binary would be better than trying MIF as a text format for SVN!  
Wow, imagine that.  




________________________________
 From: Joseph Lorenzini <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Cc: FrameMaker Forum <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 9:59 AM
Subject: Re: Document Revision Control
 

Hi Chris,

This issue you raised about binary files and SVN used to be true but is 
somewhat inaccurate now. I stayed away from SVN for a really long time because 
of this very issue. I thought it was ridiculous that every time I would make a 
commit, SVN would commit an entirely new version of the file. 

However, a couple years ago, the IT admin, who manages the SVN repos for my 
company, explained that later versions of SVN can in fact commit just the 
differences between two versions of the same binary file. I was able to confirm 
this with some testing of my own. The size of my doc repo would be 
exponentially larger if every commit was the entire FrameMaker file instead of 
the difference.

Now with that said, the following is still true:
1. committing large binary files is considered bad form and frowned upon from 
an engineering point of view. That's because SVN doesn't manage binaries nearly 
as well as it can handle text files.
2. The key thing that SVN still cannot do is actually perform SVN blame or diff 
two versions of the file for you. It can only commit the difference, it can't 
identify and compare the difference between version 1 and version 2 for you.

From a software development point of view, I can see why they'd hate on 
binaries. However, in terms of technical writing, I see the above concerns as 
addressable since there's a diffing capability built right into framemaker. All 
I have to do is check out two versions of a file and then have framemaker do a 
diff on them. Its not perfect but i think its good enough. 

Furthermore, to avoid issues with engineering, I have my own separate 
repository that's dedicated solely to documentation. Engineering doesn't know 
or care about it. 

Sincerely
Joseph Lorenzini

Original Message:

"Just a word about MIF in source control.? It's true that storing binary files 
(.fm) in source control is somewhat abusive, because the system has to store a 
complete copy of the file for each revision.? In the old days dev would never 
let you do that because storage actually cost something.?"
_______________________________________________


You are currently subscribed to framers as [email protected].

Send list messages to [email protected].

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[email protected]
or visit 
http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com

Send administrative questions to [email protected]. Visit
http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.

Reply via email to