I'll second that... 8 is much more stable and doesn't leak memory
nearly as badly.

If you have enough RAM -- 1-2 G, 8 is patched, and the files aren't
funky.... 8 is the way to go.
And I've been back saving them to 7.1 and 7.2 since 8 came out; no problems.

Art

Art Campbell
                          art.campbell at gmail.com
  "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52
Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
                                                      No disclaimers apply.
                                                               DoD 358



On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:32 PM,  <Syed.Hosain at aeris.net> wrote:
> Sorry to hear about the problems you have had, but ... I guess everyone
> has their own particular experiences that will differ.
>
> On both my older XP system, and now my rebuilt Vista system, FM 8
> crashes FAR less frequently than FM 7 (any of the 7.0, 7.1 or 7.2
> versions).
>
> I find it to be much more stable and consistent and am glad I upgraded.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> For my work, for now, I'm sticking with FM 7, which also has its
> problems, but is running on my XP machine and crashes MUCH less
> frequently.
>
> -- Emily
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> You are currently subscribed to Framers as art.campbell at gmail.com.
>
> Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit 
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/art.campbell%40gmail.com
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>

Reply via email to