Joe, just to clarify one point.... The SaveAsPDF function is still buggy in 9, although most of those issues seem to be around CMYK generation.... I don't use it.
What I'm suggesting is that your system default printer should be the Adobe logical printer so that all fonts are stable and embedded, etc. Then use File > Print Book (or Print for a file) and select the Adobe PDF printer. It'll prompt you for a PDF file name and prints and distills in one action. If you're using bookmarks and other bells & whistles, make sure the Generate Acrobat Data checkmark is activated but the Print To File checkbox is clear. Cheers, Art Art Campbell art.campbell at gmail.com "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson No disclaimers apply. DoD 358 On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Joseph Lorenzini <jaloren at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Art, > > I have a brand new system. Its a Compaq 8510w with the following specs: > > Windows XP Professional SP3 > Intel Core? 2 Duo > 17777 @ 2.40 GHz > 3 GB of RAM > > I am running Framemaker 9p250 and Acobrat Pro Extended version 9.2.0. I also > keep all the other software in the Tech com suite 2.0 up to date. > > I have always printed to a PS file because when I used FrameMaker 7, I found > the File > Save as PDF option to be slightly buggy, whereas the two-step > process was more stable. But that was then with FM7 and this is now with > FM9. I have no problem switching back and (yes skipping the additional step > would be nice). > > I am also going to look into the hotfix, which looks promising. Due to the > way my company has my laptop set up, it will automatically do all sorts of > resource intensive things in the background that I have no control over > (such as running a virus scan). Printing a large FrameMaker book to a PS > file can take several minutes. I wouldn't be surprised if some background > service started up, killing my virtual memory thus corrupting the PS file. > > Thanks for the info, > > Joe >