Just to add to the mix.? I'm noticing also that companies, irregardless of tool, customize their XML in some way that makes it become 'unpure'.?
The files that I authored in Epic, that I thought should have been very close to the open source version of XML, where unreadable by the open source compiler.? I had nothing fancy, just a heading, and a couple of paragraphs. I find it facinating.? And it feels like there is the potential for some sort of fancy doctoral study on this sort of thing.? How open source/industry standard things become customized and particular to a company or group of people. DocBook vs DITA included. Both are XML, but o, how different they are. -meg ? Message: 1 Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 09:09:51 -0600 From: Jan Whitacre <jwhi...@verizon.net> Subject: XML Output? from FrameMaker not Pure XML? ?I was told that the XML output from FrameMaker was not ?pure XML,?...that it adds some kind of FrameMaker tagging.?
