Hi hessiansx4, Here is how we define them in our doc:
. Warning mention (+ pictogram): WARNING indicates a potentially hazardous situation which, if not avoided, can result in death or serious injury. . Caution mention (+ picto): CAUTION indicates a potentially hazardous situation which, if not avoided, can result in minor or moderate injury. . Caution mention (without picto): CAUTION, used without the safety alert symbol, indicates a potentially hazardous situation which, if not avoided, can result in equipment damage. We talk about "equipment damage" because our soft is used for remote equipment control. Mathieu. > Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:42:37 -0700 > From: hessiansx4 at yahoo.com > Subject: warnings, cautions, notes in sw documentation > To: framers at lists.frameusers.com > > Hello all! I've noticed that the legacy docs I'm currently working on use > notes and warnings (no cautions) for a software product. I asked why a > warning was used instead of a caution and was told: that's the way we do it > here. I've only used warnings when bodily harm could result from some action. > How are those of y'all in the sw world doing it? > _______________________________________________ > > > You are currently subscribed to framers as bobitch at hotmail.com. > > Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com. > > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com > or visit > http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/bobitch%40hotmail.com > > Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit > http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20110801/45e02c2a/attachment.html>