Which program makes the most sense for the content? And, if you migrate, is that a good use of your time to do so given it's both a quick fix AND you're already overloaded?
Consider a content strategy going forward. Yes, it's a client and not your own managed content, but if a repeat client, having a strategy for their content rather than just a plan will help keep future cases like this at bay. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Martin Ley <martin at em-dash.com> wrote: > Fellow Framers, > > I have a conundrum... > > I have a huge body of work for one client done in FrameMaker. They want me to > do more work than I can handle alone. I have two colleagues who work with > InDesign, who might be able to help out. Would it be easier to migrate all my > FrameMaker files to InDesign, or migrate my colleagues to FrameMaker? > > An unfair question - particularly as I'm not giving you much detail - but an > interesting one! I use both Frame and ID. Horses for courses, normally, but > this is an odd situation. The client is after a quick fix, naturally, but > neither option would appear to be very straightforward. > > The FrameMaker route: I would have to migrate my colleagues to Windows too > (we're all Mac users; I'm now really happy running Frame under XP/Parallels > Desktop for Mac). Then they would have to learn Frame. > > The InDesign route: I would have to spend a lot of time getting fairly > complicated Frame book files working in InDesign. Conditional builds, text > insets, variables, markers, tables, etc etc. > > <light blue touchpaper> > <stand well back> > <await flack> > > Martin -- Bill Swallow Twitter: @techcommdood Blog: http://techcommdood.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/techcommdood