Well that's certainly good news! As you know, 2581 modules is quite a lot. Certainly too many to assess individually, so that table helps a lot. I have used it, and tried a couple of the modules, most recently about 18 months ago, but I ran into trouble with finishing the job; I could successfully import a hundred procedures or so, but at the time I could not match the new db entries into useful nodes for Support (IIRC it could only make one very limited content type). When I realized that I would have to tag them all individually, I put it to the back burner rather than work though the issues. I guess there has been a lot of development in that time. I hope to get back to it soon, unless...
Yves (and Jeremy) is right that DITA would be a natural way to go for this project. And if I move the DITA project to the front burner, then the Drupal side of the project will be even more advanced, or even solved by the time I have DITA under control. (Very sincere apologies to my good friend Art for hijacking his WordPress thread!) john -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy H. Griffith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 9:18 PM To: FrameUsers List Cc: John Sgammato Subject: Re: Anyone else looking at Frame >> WordPress (as a CMS) On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:13:36 -0500, "Jeremy H. Griffith" <jeremy at omsys.com> wrote: >In fact, if you go to drupal.org and search for "import HTML files", >you get 279986 hits. The module above is just the first one. If you >set the filter to "Modules", you have only 2581 to look through... ><vbg> And if you want a nice set of tables showing the major choices and their features, go to the Wiki page at: http://groups.drupal.org/node/21338 There are modules that go to/from WordPress, too, via CSV, and import WordPress Extended RSS: http://drupal.org/project/wordpress_import I love Drupal. ;-) -- Jeremy H. Griffith, at Omni Systems Inc. <jeremy at omsys.com> http://www.omsys.com/
