HI Fei,
We also use the AXCM plug-in for the colors and I understand why you don't want 
to use the over/underlines or other lines in addition to color.

I do recall one of our other teams using a script to add the tag name (i.e. 
Product1) to the beginning of each text that uses that conditional tag. In this 
way, you could leave your colors for your customers who are not color blind and 
would appreciate the coloring, and have a text delineation as well - to 
indicate what product is being discussed.
(You know also that you can leave the coloring in the PDF and define the PDF to 
print only black and white).

Alternatively, you could search per condition and apply a different font or 
font size or some other character change - although that would look funny  (it 
might be ok for some things) - here, however, the search and replace would be 
ridiculously simple - Search (even throughout the entire book) for ConditionA 
and replace by PASTING  a character tag (you could define font 10, Arial Narrow 
as opposed to Arial, or underline, or whatever). Obviously, you should test it 
first so nothing goes wrong.
Best Regards,
Orly.


You wrote:

>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:06:39 -0700
>From: "Fei Min Lorente" <FeiMin.Lorente at onsemi.com>
>To: <framers at lists.frameusers.com>
>Subject: Looking for the best way to highlight text to the reader
>Message-ID:
>          <344EADC893FE4040946404586D86121463A857 at NAMAIL2.ad.onsemi.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Structured FrameMaker 7.2 on Windows XP, AXCM version 2.01, and FrameScript.
>
>
>
>I have some manuals that are going to be published separately for different 
>products. I'm using an attribute value for conditional text, and the AXCM 
>plug-in to color and >filter the manuals. Normally, I remove colorizing for 
>the final publication, but this time, the program manager wants to show the 
>differences. We want to avoid using color in >case someone decides to print 
>the manuals (yes, we still ship PDF as well as HTML). AXCM offers underlining, 
>double underlining, overlining, strikethrough, and revision >bars in addition 
>to colors. I'm not completely satisfied with any of these solutions because 
>the underscores in some words gets lost with the underlining, and it gets a 
>bit >messy when you have a whole page underlined. On the other hand, revision 
>bars look a bit like it's a draft and it doesn't show what changed on a line.
>Can anyone think of some alternatives considering the tools I have at my 
>disposal? For example, is there any way to change the revision bar to another 
>character or >characters?
>
>
>
>Fei Min
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Fei Min Lorente
>Senior Technical Communicator
>Medical Division
>ON Semiconductor
>feimin.lorente at onsemi.com <mailto:feimin.lorente at onsemi.com>
>+1 519 884 9696 ext 2297 | office
>+1 519 831 4931 | mobile
>+1 519 884 0228 | fax
>http://www.onsemi.com<http://www.onsemi.com/> 
><http://www.onsemi.com<http://www.onsemi.com/>>
>-------------------------------------------------------


________________________________
Orly Zimmerman, Marvell Israel - Technical Communicator
Park Azorim, Kyriat Arie
Petah Tikva, 49527, Israel
Email: orlyz at marvell.com<mailto:orlyz at marvell.com>
Office: +972.3.9703440 - OnNet: 705.3440
Fax: +972.3.9704908
Web site: http://www.marvell.com<http://www.marvell.com/>

This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged 
information. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or 
entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or by e-mail 
and delete the message from your computer.
________________________________

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20110630/c476c505/attachment.html>

Reply via email to