Virginia Morgan wrote: > Any other experience/advice is appreciated. My recent graphic design > experience has also led me to conclude that .jpgs work well for much > more than photos, but the main reason we didn't use them in old > versions of FrameMaker (6.0 and before) even with photos was that we > got the "ugly gray box" which was annoying since you couldn't see your > output until you produced a PDF. I'm assuming that "feature" is no > longer the case? Like John, I would prefer to work with .jpgs if they > produced the result I need. (Working in Windows XP, Frame10 currently.)
I just noticed this message, which seems to have gotten to my inbox rather belatedly. Virginia, you're misremembering regarding the "ugly gray box." That's not from an imported JPEG, it's from an imported EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) file that doesn't include a TIFF preview. FM can't display EPS, so it displays the low-resolution preview image (often even uglier than the gray box) that's often included in an EPS file. If the EPS doesn't include the TIFF preview, FM just uses the gray box as a placeholder. The lovely PostScript image appears in all its glory when you print or PDF. Richard G. Combs Senior Technical Writer Polycom, Inc. richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom 303-223-5111 ------ rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom 303-903-6372 ------
