Keith/Jeremy, I did an upgrade on such a configuration from 4 GB to 8GB, and noticed a startling increase in performance with OUTLOOK. Newer OS's are thirsty.
Maxwell Hoffmann |? Product? Evangelist? |? Adobe? |? p. 503.336.5952? |? c. 503.805.3719? |? mhoffman at adobe.com http://twitter.com/maxwellhoffmann -? http://www.linkedin.com/in/maxwellhoffmann? blogs.adobe.com/techcomm Upcoming webinars http://adobe.ly/Pbz6xI Recorded webinars: http://adobe.ly/Pbdp0J -----Original Message----- From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Soltys Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:52 AM To: Jeremy H. Griffith; Framers Mailing List (framers at lists.frameusers.com) Subject: RE: Very slow paging in FM 10 in graphic-heavy files I think the memory issue came up in response to some else who posted in the thread about having a similar issue with FM11. They were running Win7 32-bit and performance had improved when they upgraded from 4 GB to 8 GB RAM. Regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers- > bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy H. Griffith > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 12:46 PM > To: framers at lists.frameusers.com > Subject: Re: Very slow paging in FM 10 in graphic-heavy files > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:51:26 -0700, Dov Isaacs > > <isaacs at adobe.com> wrote: > > >Now if you are on Windows 64-bit, even though FrameMaker is a 32-bit > >application, performance may significantly improve with additional > >memory simply because FrameMaker is not competing for real memory as > >opposed to virtual memory; less paging equals much higher performance. > > That's what Tammy said at the very start, first line of the opening > post in the > thread: > >> FM 10.0 (all patched and current)/Win 7, 64 -bit > > ;-)
