Typically when someone says, "If I was xyz" or "if I were xyz" they are referring to something that is in fact not the case. Which, stricly speaking, means that "conditional, contrary to fact" is true 100% of the time. I'm curious if "was" would EVER be appropriate based on that constraint.
Tim From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of dave.st...@gdc4s.com Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 4:39 AM To: TechSubs at VibrantLivingMinistries.org; framers at lists.frameusers.com Subject: RE: Usage question - subjunctive mood? (WAS: anyone looking for a writer?) 2013-04-08-01T11:40Z Yes, "If I were looking . . . " is correct. It conveys the concept of "conditional, contrary to fact": "I wasn't looking, but if I had been looking . . .." I choose to believe that those who might read or hear such an expression don't consider it "hifalutin'" and accept it. ?Who knows? The reader or listener might even learn something about the language. Regards, Dave Stamm Information Engineer CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review, forwarding, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, and delete it and all attachments from your computer and network. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130408/bdc2210d/attachment.html>
