And there you have it?all the reasons I hosted jpegisbad.com for a few years as 
a joke!

-Matt

Matt R. Sullivan 
co-author Publishing Fundamentals: Unstructured FrameMaker 11 
P: 714.798.7596 | C: 714.585.2335 | matt at mattrsullivan.com 

@mattrsullivan LinkedIn facebook mattrsullivan.com 

On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:06 AM, "Syed Zaeem Hosain (Syed.Hosain at aeris.net)" 
<Syed.Hosain at aeris.net> wrote:

> As you have already seen the other messages, this is just an endorsement to 
> *avoid* JPEG for anything that contain pixels that are next to each other and 
> have sharp color transitions ... as happens with lines and drawings and text, 
> etc.
> 
> No matter what "quality" you save the JPG with such content, the results will 
> not be great. Basically, the transitions from one color to another at the 
> edge of such objects get speckled dots - sometimes more than a few pixels far 
> from the color transition - and also additional "transition color" pixels on 
> both sides of the color change locations.
> 
> These extra dots then show up in the printed output (if it is a high-quality 
> ink-jet or any color laser) and, depending on the colors, can be pretty 
> obviosu. The text and lines get smeared - the sharp transition between the 
> text color and the background color gets softened. In the worst case, narrow 
> lines disappear or get broken up pretty badly.
> 
> Bottom line: JPEG's are fine for pictures, but even there, using a 
> high-quality JPEG (from a non-lossy source image ideally) is important - 
> repetitively editing and saving the JPEG from image editor programs can 
> increase the "noise" in the JPEG over time.
> 
> Z
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com [mailto:framers-bounces at 
> lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Richard Doll
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:00 AM
> To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
> Subject: jpg images
> 
> all,
> 
> ?what version(s) of Framemaker (structured) supports and processes jpeg 
> format images?
> 
> and
> 
> ?what is the impact of their use in ink-on-paper (high quality 300dpi) 
> printing?
> 
> best to all,
> 
> dick doll
> 317.539.4857
> sgmlindy at tds.net 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> You are currently subscribed to framers as matt at mattrsullivan.com.
> 
> Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
> 
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit 
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/matt%40mattrsullivan.com
> 
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130425/684b19be/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: twitter.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1331 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130425/684b19be/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: linkedin.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1380 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130425/684b19be/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: facebook.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1576 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130425/684b19be/attachment-0002.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: blog.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1222 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130425/684b19be/attachment-0003.png>

Reply via email to