Scott Prentice wrote:
> > If your PDF layout requirements are very simple, XSL-FO *may* be a good option > for you. ... > In my opinion, FO is good for high volume and moderate to low PDF formatting > requirements. Yes, you can make it do most of what you can do with Frame, but > it'll > require a huge amount of coding and effort. I have seen people spend well over > $200K on FO development over many years to achieve moderate looking PDFs. > Something that might take a week to develop with FrameMaker. That's not been my experience with FO templating. I've seen FO templating take maybe 1.5-3x as long as in FrameMaker. $200k sounds more like they developed an entire formatting engine. Harro de Jong Triview
