> I don't need any flexibility. These are the only two tags that will ever need > icons.
Then, yes, my approach would be overkill for your case, I suppose. :) FWIW, I have these paragraph formats available in all my documents. Including both the auto-number method (and which also involves using side-heads since I want the auto-number "text" to be at the left side of the paragraph) _and_ my character format method ... I have been using both for years now. And, knowledge of the methods might benefit others (perhaps for new documents where the work to add them to existing documents is not large), since I have had a number of people ask for that sample FM file I had offered in a previous response. Z On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Syed Zaeem Hosain (Syed.Hosain at aeris.net) <Syed.Hosain at aeris.net> wrote: > (I am not sure I _entirely_ understand what you mean.) > > If you mean "one paragraph format" and "one character format" (if you want to > use an icon), then, yes, that is true. > > But my approach gives you more flexibility in one way. Using an autonumber > requires a _separate_ paragraph format for each type of icon you want - i.e., > each with its own auto-number sequence. That can work, of course, but if you > have enough _different_ icons, then my approach is simpler, I believe (as > long as the icons are all from in a single given font - like ZapfDingbats for > example).
