Hmm. Structured FrameMaker and XML source might work. Maybe I'll give that a try.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Laura Lemay <lemay at lauralemay.com> wrote: > > I haven't used crucible, but we use both review board and gerrit for doc > reviews, which are similar systems. From looking through the crucible screen > shots, it looks like it has the same problem as RB and gerrit: it's designed > for *code.* The input is text. You get changes as code diffs. You can put > raw HTML into it, but then you run into problems with reviewers having > trouble visualizing what the doc looks like when rendered, and of different > HTML formatters creating spurious changes based on line breaks. > > For us using HTML for the reviews is unpleasant and ugly but it does work. > We've been looking for a better solution.
