Fei Min, Yes, both Omnihelp and OracleHelp for Java are very fast and very flexible. Both the HTML Help Workshop help and Mif2Go Users Guide, discuss how to go about creating the tags necessary to make context-sensitive help work. The primary thing, from what i have have found, is the calls from the help to the application requires close coordination between the help and application developers to determine a mutually agreeable tag content.
On Sunday, November 24, 2013 9:12 AM, Fei Min Lorente <FeiMin.Lorente at onsemi.com> wrote: Okay, point taken. We won?t worry about all the HTML files being exposed in OmniHelp. And our software developer did notice how fast it was. ? So we?re looking at context-sensitive help to see if we can get that to work in MS Help Viewer or anything else. It?s not a requirement right now, especially if it?s going to add any significant time to the schedule, but I?m convinced that it?s a key feature that can enhance the user experience, and one of the few advantages that HTML can provide over PDF. If we don?t implement it this time around, I?d like to include it next time. ? Fei Min ? From:David Spreadbury [mailto:dspreadb at yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 7:43 AM To: Fei Min Lorente; framers at lists.frameusers.com Subject: Re: Choosing a Help Format ? Fei Min, Personally I think you are stabbing at windmills. It isn't all that difficult to decompile a CHM, make a change, and recompile. How many do? I produce OracleHelp for Java from Frame source. It also produces HTML for the content. It is delivered as server based, but there is nothing to prevent someone changing the HTML. Haven't heard of anyone doing it. Dave ? ? On Friday, November 22, 2013 12:43 PM, Fei Min Lorente <FeiMin.Lorente at onsemi.com> wrote: Okay, that would explain why no one seems to be using Eclipse Help unless it's an Eclipse product. :-) We're concerned about the OmniHelp files on the theory that if people can do something, someone will. That could be a completely unfounded concern, so I'm glad to hear opinions to the contrary. Fei Min -----Original Message----- From: robert.lauriston at gmail.com [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Lauriston Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 12:26 PM To: Fei Min Lorente; framers at lists.frameusers.com Subject: Re: Choosing a Help Format I agree with Jeremy, standalone EclipseHelp is a huge and complicated distributable. It's not a practical format. I'm not sure if there's a use case where it would make sense. Why would users mess with your help files? On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Fei Min Lorente <FeiMin.Lorente at onsemi.com> wrote: > And we weren't worried about OmniHelp losing files; we are worried about > users going in and messing with them. Is there any way to lock them down? > > We're very curious about using standalone Eclipse Help; has anyone here used > it for a non-Eclipse-based product? If not, I'll take this question to the > eclipse_tw group. _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to framers as dspreadb at yahoo.com. Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/dspreadb%40yahoo.com Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20131124/9dc96709/attachment.html>
