To address a lot of questions in one email: None of these are stupid questions, 
and I don't take any as such. I have to be cognizant of what my SME prefers and 
is comfortable with to maintain and edit the equations, but I need to use 
Framemaker because the manual is a massive technical manual that details all 
the scientific principles behind the equations and it is riddled with other 
graphics, x-references, etc and I need to share the equations with yet another 
manual. . . so that make FM the go to tool for final production. Yes, it's a 
bit of a sticky mess, but it's what I have to work with and I can push only so 
much. If my SME uses an open source editor such as MathType, it appears that I 
can save each equation as a GIF at 150 dpi. . . might be good enough, I am not 
sure but anyway, each equation would have to be its own file to accomplish this 
and that would add extra overhead for my SME. When you save the Word document 
to htm/html, then Windoze assumes (and rightfully so) that you're using the 
content for the Web, so the equations are saved out as PNGs at 96 dpi, which is 
fine for the web, but not for print, and upsampling obviously is not possible. 
So, even though I am importing each PNG, and then printing the book to .ps 
which I send to a watched folder, and then distilling in Distiller w/ custom 
job options, it doesn't make a difference. The PNGs are at 96 dpi and that's 
all I got to work with. I tried to save the Word docx as an .rtf as per Lin 
(because in Avdvanced Settings, you can specify the image resolution that you 
want for images in the Save As function), but the equations are not being saved 
as PNGs in this case as Lin indicated. . . I am sure that it's a 
version-dependent function and my version is Word 2016. I also tried the change 
the name to .zip and extract, but the equations are NOT being recognized as 
media objects w/ this approach so no media folder exists w/ the equations as 
PNGs. Why they are being recognized as such for htm/html conversion but not 
this way, I have no idea. For now, I have a workaround . . . I have saved the 
Word file to a PDF, and I then crop each equation out and save as a PDF and 
then I will import the equation as PDF. At least that way they are vector 
images and not rasterized, and zooming in and out in a PDF doesn't affect them. 
. .crisp and clean no matter the zoom level. But, I am open to any other 
thoughts besides calling it good for Friday and drowning myself in a pitcher of 
margaritas . . hey, it's 11:30 somewhere. TVB Tammy Van Boening Tammy dot 
vanboening at spectrumwritingllc dot com www.spectrumwritingllc.com 
-----Original Message----- From: Framers On Behalf Of Peter Gold Sent: Friday, 
August 6, 2021 11:38 AM To: An email list for people using Adobe FrameMaker 
software. Subject: Re: [Framers] Appearance of graphics in the generated PDF 
Are there any options you or the SME author can set, which would affect the 
equation editor's HTML output? If so, are there any meaningful improvements? 
Any roads not yet taken? On Fri, Aug 6, 2021, 12:04 PM Fred Ridder wrote: > I 
suspect the answer is that whoever is creating the equations does > not have 
(and does not want to have to pay for and learn how to use) a > FrameMaker 
license. > > But a perhaps less stupid question is whether it's possible and > 
practical to use a free-standing equation editor (e.g., MathType, > MathMagic) 
or a tool that is based on LaTeX (e.g. LyX)? The LaTeX > approach is kind of 
PITA because even the best tools are only WYSIWYM > (what you see is what you 
mean​), but most professinals consider the > end result to be the best quality 
available. > > -FR > > ________________________________ > From: Framers > > on 
behalf of Lin Sims > Sent: Friday, August 6, 2021 8:06 AM > To: An email list 
for people using Adobe FrameMaker software. < > [email protected]> > 
Subject: Re: [Framers] Appearance of graphics in the generated PDF > > Probably 
a stupid question, but is there a reason you're creating the > equations in 
Word rather than in Frame's Equation Editor? > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 6:32 PM 
wrote: > > > I have an equation-laden document that I am writing. The equations 
> > are being created in a Word doc (.docx) using Word's native equation > > 
editor. The .docx file is then saved as an .htm/.html file and all > > the 
equations in the document are automatically saved as .pngs in a > > separate 
folder named as image.(n), where n is the image number. I > > double-click an 
equation in > this > > folder to automatically open the equation in my image 
editor (SnagIT > > - I don't need anything as heavy as Photoshop as I am not 
doing any > > modifications to the equations) and save the equation without any 
> > changes to it whatsoever with a new name. I then import the image > > into 
Framemaker by > > reference. I don't mess w/ the dpi of the image when I select 
it for > > import - any image in the folder that was created during the saving 
> > of > the > > Word file shows a dpi of 96 in the Imported Graphic Scaling 
dialog > > box > when > > I select it for import and although this seems nutty 
to me (because > > none > of > > the images are over-sized). . . they look 
clear and crisp in the > > source > FM > > file (The Advanced Properties of any 
image in SnagIT is also showing > > a resolution of 96 dpi); however, upon 
generation of the PDF, it > > goes to h*ll in a handbasket. The equation looks 
almost as if the > > font is almost bold and therefore much darker than the 
text in the > > FM source file, and it's not nearly as crisp and clear as in 
the > > source FM document - it actually > looks > > blurry/pixelated. > > 
_______________________________________________ > > This message is from the 
Framers mailing list > > Send messages to [email protected] Visit 
the list's > homepage at http://www.frameusers.com Archives located at > 
http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ > Subscribe and 
unsubscribe at > 
http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com > Send 
administrative questions to [email protected] 
_______________________________________________ This message is from the 
Framers mailing list Send messages to [email protected] Visit the 
list's homepage at http://www.frameusers.com Archives located at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/ Subscribe and 
unsubscribe at http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com 
Send administrative questions to [email protected] Scanned by McAfee and 
confirmed virus-free. Find out more here: https://bit.ly/2zCJMrO


_______________________________________________

This message is from the Framers mailing list

Send messages to [email protected]
Visit the list's homepage at  http://www.frameusers.com
Archives located at http://www.mail-archive.com/framers%40lists.frameusers.com/
Subscribe and unsubscribe at 
http://lists.frameusers.com/listinfo.cgi/framers-frameusers.com
Send administrative questions to [email protected]

Reply via email to