On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 08:11 +0000, Ross Burton wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 07:05 +0200, Mikael Lammentausta wrote: > > It would probably be much more suitable for Neo's limited resources > > than the X architecture, although compatibility and code reuse will > > probably severely limit the available software. :( > > Although this is open repeated, remember that Neo has several times more > computing power and memory than the machines that X was originally > written and used on.
Thanks to Iain for pointing this out to me: http://www.picogui.org/News/News_Item.2003-10-27.html "I'm sure some of you have guessed by now that the PicoGUI project isn't going anywhere." Considering it isn't maintained and hasn't been released since 2003, it's probably a bad idea. Ross -- OpenedHand Ltd. Unit R Homesdale Business Center / 216-218 Homesdale Road / Bromley / BR1 2QZ / UK Tel: +44 (0)20 8819 6559 Expert Open Source For Consumer Devices - http://o-hand.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part