-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 H D Moore wrote: > On Monday 22 December 2008, ArcSighter Elite wrote: >> No, I haven't tested that in such a way. In fact I should check >> metasploit's diffs more often instead of updating :D > > http://grutz.jingojango.net/exploits/pokehashball.html > > Not currently integrated, but will be eventually. > > In your python code, which type of NTLM authentication are you using? > Standard NTLMv2 lanman/ntlm, or the fancier NTLMSSP with all over the > encoded fields? I was wondering whether that made a difference and have > not had a chance to write/test it yet. > > -HD > _______________________________________________ > Framework-Hackers mailing list > Framework-Hackers@spool.metasploit.com > http://spool.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework-hackers >
I'm using request['ident'] = NTLMSSP. I haven't also tested if this is the issue; but at least I hope we've identified the differences. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJURd9H+KgkfcIQ8cRAlr6AKDL6XJS09xEHrRz8oBidk/zWSc2HwCggj/M hpnPyXKcPdv9TbFmy1KFbMM= =QvsI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Framework-Hackers mailing list Framework-Hackers@spool.metasploit.com http://spool.metasploit.com/mailman/listinfo/framework-hackers
