I'm just worried that in August most people will be in holidays and they will not be able to provide the bundle.
Maybe it is not a "real" issue but I just wanted to raise the problem. Thanks, vds On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 10:24 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hi guys, > > - August 28: proposal freeze, fwt starts reviewing bundles > - September 25: fwt finished reviewing bundles > - Sep 25 - October 8: two week period during which bundles can > be > updated and re-reviewed based on the initial review > > I expect bundles will be worked on during the whole Aug 28-Oct 8 > period. For that to work, we ought to give some initial feedback > quickly, so that we say "yes, this is a good idea" and make ourselves > (or this list or just plone-developers) available for people to get a > bit of coaching. The knowledge that someone is actively pushing a > bundle, and actively seeking ways of making it better and getting it > done is just as important as the completeness of the bundle on August > 28th! > > > - October 9: > > Did you miss one out? I assume you meant merge date? > > > - November 30: first beta release > - January 22: first release candidate > - March 12: release > > +1 for those dates *if* we can agree on them now and start hounding > people for bundles *this week*. > > > The basic idea behind these dates is that we need some extra > time to get > people moving on 3.0 and take the time needed to properly > integrate > the bundles. If we make some more noise about late betas and > rc1 > hopefully we can get more upgrade feedback sooner. > > Indeed. Speaking from personal experience, I held up on trying 2.5 > until it was quite late in the day, mostly from my own laziness. We > ought to make it as easy for people to evaluate as possible, by > providing installers (I guess we have nightly builds now) and bundles > that are known to work > > I'd also suggest that we have a rolling "Coming in 3.0" overview > document that gives people some tasters and some specifics ("to test > this feature now, download this and click here and here"). > > > > And of course, we should be noisy on the lists to let people know > there is momentum, but that's my job :) > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Framework-Team mailing list > Framework-Team@lists.plone.org > http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team -- Vincenzo Di Somma REFLAB (Studio Associato) design, development and consulting T: +39 349 756 54 60 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.reflab.com Weblog: http://www.reflab.com/blogs/vdsblog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team