Previously Alexander Limi wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea what approach people like Google (Gmail etc) use
> for their implementation? It certainly seems like the most sensible
> implementation out there wrt. to end-user usability - and I'm pretty sure
> it scales too.
Judging from how I've seen google sites behave they use something
similar to how OpenID works: have a seperate authentication site which
sites a domain-wide cookie which is picked by the all the
application-sites. Those can verify the cookie internally and will
probably cache the result.
> Is the session overhead a Zope-specific problem because of the
> implementation there, or is it something with using this approach
The Zope-specific bit is that the default Zope session setup does not (by
design) support Zeo clusters.
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Framework-Team mailing list