On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:43:18 -0500, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Do people have opinions on this:


It seems to be a very trivial patch to AT, and it could be really
useful, but I don't know about the implications for installers and how
bad the performance overhead would be.

Daniel, thoughts on this for AT trunk?

also fwiw, as limi noted, ben relayed that this functionality should already be in at, it was at one time apparently.

i'd prefer to rewrite that patch as a patch to file field setting up index an accessor that runs the transforms, instead of the baseobject.searchabletext hardcoding.

ideally all of this (including indexing process) would be async to the request.. but cmfeditions breaks with queuecatalog afaicr.. else utilizing clockserver in conjunction might be a nice option.



Framework-Team mailing list

Reply via email to