My personal non-framework team opinion: Previously Encolpe Degoute wrote: > I'd like to see the following for 3.1: > > #196: GroupUserFolder removing > > There were and there are a lot of critical UI bugs around > GroupUserFolder by PlonePAS. Because of these, several Plone release had > to be delayed. We fix a lot of them in customer branch.
I think this is a too large undertaking for 3.1 and I suspect that there is too much code that uses GRUF-APIs that (Plone)PAS does support, which means that that code will break. That is not allowed in a 3.x release. I love the idea though :) > #214: Merge of CMFPlacefulWorkflow into CMFPlone/WorkflowTool > > CMFPlacefulWorkflow is now mature enough to be merge into the workflow tool: > > * since two major version there's no critical bug on it > * GenericSetup support is implemented in the trunk > * let him outside the workflow tool would leave 2 more monkey > patches in Plone bundle > * all page templates can be merged into a plone_workflow skin with > the #210 How does the CMF workflow tool factor into this? I would be nice if we can remove the CMFPlone WorkflowTool and use the CMF one, but I have no idea how the CMF community feels about CMFPlacefulWorkflow. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
