Wichert Akkerman a écrit :
> My personal non-framework team opinion:
> Previously Encolpe Degoute wrote:
>> I'd like to see the following for 3.1:
>> #196: GroupUserFolder removing
>> There were and there are a lot of critical UI bugs around
>> GroupUserFolder by PlonePAS. Because of these, several Plone release had
>> to be delayed. We fix a lot of them in customer branch.
> I think this is a too large undertaking for 3.1 and I suspect that there
> is too much code that uses GRUF-APIs that (Plone)PAS does support, which
> means that that code will break. That is not allowed in a 3.x release.

I can do the UI part without modifying portal_groups and portal_groupdata.

> I love the idea though :)

Me too: It's one less product to maintain.

>> #214: Merge of CMFPlacefulWorkflow into CMFPlone/WorkflowTool
>> CMFPlacefulWorkflow is now mature enough to be merge into the workflow tool:
>>     * since two major version there's no critical bug on it
>>     * GenericSetup support is implemented in the trunk
>>     * let him outside the workflow tool would leave 2 more monkey
>> patches in Plone bundle
>>     * all page templates can be merged into a plone_workflow skin with
>> the #210
> How does the CMF workflow tool factor into this? I would be nice if we
> can remove the CMFPlone WorkflowTool and use the CMF one, but I have no
> idea how the CMF community feels about CMFPlacefulWorkflow.

I never had any report or any comment from CMF users or developpers.

Encolpe Degoute
INGENIWEB (TM) - S.A.S 50000 Euros - RC B 438 725 632
17 rue Louise Michel - 92300 Levallois Perret - France
web : www.ingeniweb.com - « les Services Web Ingénieux »
Tel : / Fax : 01 47 57 39 14

Framework-Team mailing list

Reply via email to