Malthe Borch wrote:
If this belongs in Plone, then it's pretty much ready for inclusion.
I do quite like this approach. I think it brings back some of the
"convention over configuration" we've been moving away from.
Does this conflict in any way with CacheFu? I say that because IIRC it
monkey patches pt_render() and IIRC so does CacheFu. Not a criticism,
just something to watch out for.
My only concern would be whether this ties us into an implementation
that we could want to solve differently in the future, e.g. using named
template adapters. Again, not a criticism, it just needs to be thought
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
Framework-Team mailing list