On Dec 13, 2007, at 6:24 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007 5:06 PM, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Please consider PLIP #209:http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/209 for Plone 3.1 The proposal is to provide a version of the Unified Installer that builds the base Python, but then uses buildout for the final steps. The would replace the existing Unified Installer, which is based on the traditional tarball installation approach.Having never used the unified installer myself, I find it hard to fully appreciate the risks involved with using buildout for this. However, I am a great fan of buildout and using it as a basis for Plone installs is in my opinion a honking great idea. +1 from me.
can't add to that as it's the same here, so +1 as well. andi -- zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779 pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/ plone 3.0.4 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team