On Feb 19, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
I have been reviewing last night but only posted my review in the review notes inside the plip. I was under the assumption that that was sufficient, sorry for that but I did review them.
no, it's not. as stated here several times before, all communication has to go through either the trac tickets or the framework list, ideally both and cc'ing the PLIP authors.
And to be honest, I didn't know that I had to vote for plips I didn't review myself.
this has also been said _at least_ twice on the list, and pretty clearly so. both of the mails i quickly found were also cc'ed to you, btw.
Does that make any sense? I fully acqknowledge the reviewers ability to make a good judgement for the plips.
it certainly does. as said before[1] every team member needs to read all other review notes, ideally give them some thought :), and cast their votes as to recommend the PLIPs inclusion for 3.1. this policy has been in place for 3.0 as well, and imho it should definitely remain the same.
cheers, andi [1] http://lists.plone.org/pipermail/framework-team/2008-February/001909.html -- zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.de/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] friedelstraße 31 - 12047 berlin - telefon +49 30 25563779 pgp key at http://zitc.de/pgp - http://wwwkeys.de.pgp.net/ plone 3.0.6 released! -- http://plone.org/products/plone
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
