Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Alexander Limi wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Raphael Ritz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
To me, this looks just fine.
Are there only 5 members? I thought there were more. If not, ignore me. :)
They are only five members in the current active team. It is only those
five who have done an incredbible job at getting Plone 3.1 reviewed ;)
They have been lots of members who served on former teams, though.
PS: maybe it's about time to think about a
new team for Plone 4 (or Plone 3.3 even) though.
I think the general consensus is to keep the 3.0 team for Plone 3.3 (for
continuity), and elect a new FWT for 4.0 — and some overlap would be
good, to make sure the lessons learned from the 3.x releases will be
carried over.
I think the consensus has indeed been to keep the same team for the 3.x
releases, unless someone wants to step down for any reason.
For 4.0 we do indeed need a new team. I for one would be happy to serve
on that team again :)
I think we should set a goal of retaining at least 3 people from the
current team and recruiting 2-4 new (or returning) superstars.
Just to put a specific goal out there. ;-) Not sure when the new team
should be in place, though... conference? Before?
best,
jon
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
