On Nov 1, 2008, at 3:29 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 22:37, Steve McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Martijn Pieters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd like to see people nominated as well; perhaps candidates need to
have someone second them? Not sure what standing we'd expect from
Do you think you'll get a lot of candidates? If not, I'd say keep the
process low-overhead and just take self-nominations.
Okay; I guess we review the candidates anyway. I am just concerned
that suitable candidates may be shy to step up themselves; it can take
some guts to step up to the plate and say "I want to help decide what
the future of Plone is going to be like". Nominating should be an
option too, something like "if you know someone you think is perfect
for the job, let us know".
Nomination doesn't have to be formalized. If you have people in mind,
why not contact them directly and encourage them to submit a self-
nomination? Then a shy person would know that they are welcome, but
would still have to demonstrate some initiative.
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the
work: (206) 286-1235 x32
mobile: (206) 679-3833
Subscribe to ONEList, our email newsletter!
Practical advice for effective online engagement
Framework-Team mailing list