On 25 Dec 2008, at 17:08, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Comments? Anything else people want to know at this point?
One question and one suggestion. Responses -- from the Team, not
necessarily from Hanno -- need not be 'at this point', January some
time will be fine.
A first "beta" release closely before the Plone conference would be
good to have.
allowing not-yet-fully finished features to be included into those
From my viewpoint of click testing (and extending then click testing)
such TPs will be warmly welcomed.
If the documentation for a change is not yet updated, we can already
- "include it"
+ "include the change"
Removal of a feature/code from a technology preview,
removal of a feature/code from a Plone core release,
trust in developers
Recalling from the Evangelism forum a post <http://n2.nabble.com/Should-we-be-doing-things-like-this--tp1587801p1602360.html
> concerning (amongst other things) compatibility and breakage, I
think the following phrase may require clarification:
we can remove the feature again from the codebase. Inclusion into a
release can happen on the basis of trusting the developer who did
the change to follow up on it and maintain it. If he doesn't, we can
remove a feature again from the codebase.
* remove from the base during technology preview phase?
* remove from the base following a release?
(I understand that such removals are exceptionally rare, and always
well-justified, but newcomers encountering the phrase may be alarmed.)
In clarifying the phrase above we can express both:
* the rarity and timeliness of such removals
and more importantly
* the underlying fact that trust is very well-placed.
Framework-Team mailing list