-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Erik Rose wrote: > On Dec 28, 2008, at 5:23 , Tom Lazar wrote: > >> i particularly like the notion of using workflow states as >> 'reminders' to make sure aspects aren't missed. > > OTOH, workflow states are serial, and it'd be a shame to force teams > to do their evaluations in a specific order.
You can actually have multiple workflows for a given type. I may be the only person who has ever actually used the feature, but it is truly helpful at times. Having the doc team work in one (simple) workflow, the UI team in another, and the FWT in the "main" workflow, with gates based on the other two, might be the best solution. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [email protected] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJXmwM+gerLs4ltQ4RAo4wAKCh9iooip7l2tmaH7n76VQ0blD7wgCgw/ec CZdooBBPBwtS4csaAXmLYoY= =0vbS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
